Exegesis

  

Do you enjoy our preaching resources?

Thanks to the ongoing support of our generous benefactors, The Athenaeum of Ohio / Mount St. Mary’s Seminary is able to provide solid, Catholic resources to priests, deacons and lay ministers. Your support, and prayers, will help us to help them Lead the Church and Change the World!

Make Your Online Donation Today!


 

Select Exegesis
September, 16 2018

24th Sunday of Ordinary Time (B)

Sr. Betty Jane Lillie, S.C.

Is 50:5-9 Ps 116:1-6; 8-9 Jas 2:14-18 Mk 8:27-35

      

          

            As we have followed the Gospels of Mark we have noticed several incidents that contribute to an understanding of the identity of Jesus.  In our Gospel reading for this week we have another such incident introduced by Jesus himself in his conversation with his disciples.  He asked them two questions. 

            The first question was, “Who do people say that I am?” (Mk 8:27)  Then he followed up with the second question, “But who do you say that I am?” (Mk 8:29)  The answer to the first question was ambiguous: People say different things, and generally they are not quite sure.  The second question was answered by Peter very directly.  Jesus is the Christ.

            Jesus instructed the disciples not to give out that information about him at that time.  Perhaps it was not yet the time for that announcement.  Or, on the other hand, maybe it is another instance of the use of the Markan Secret.  However, if that were the case, then there would likely have been a public announcement of the information.  In fact, what Jesus began to preach was something different.  He made a prediction of his Passion, Death, and Resurrection.  Whereas Peter had at first answered very clearly about Jesus’ identity, he nevertheless did not display clarity on the point that the Messiah would suffer. 

            Messianic hopes in the Hebrew Scriptures usually involved expectation of temporal peace and well-being for the nation of Israel.  They looked for a king like David to bring prosperity and security throughout the realm and protection from external aggression.  In Peter’s response about Jesus’ Messianic identity there may have been remnants of that thinking, and clearly the prediction of suffering and death for Jesus as Messiah did not fit the picture.  It was a whole reversal of the popular assumption. 

            Jesus rebuked Peter very strongly, as much as telling him that he had not listened to the Master.  Two ideas may be involved in Jesus’ calling Peter a Satan.  Maybe Jesus was intimating that this was another of the temptations like those to which he had been subjected at the beginning of his public life. (Mk 1:13)  Or, maybe the Hebrew word Satan which refers to something like an aggravator, was used to describe Peter’s action here.  In either case, though Peter had correctly identified Jesus in this passage as Messiah, and on another occasion declared that his faith would not be shaken, he later made a threefold denial of even knowing Jesus. Peter seems to have had a hard time getting all of this straight.  Even after the resurrection when his threefold avowel of love for Jesus seemed to have brought it all in line, we know from history that when he was fleeing from the persecution in Rome Jesus appeared to him and turned him around to go back to take his place among the suffering people who were faithful.  Peter’s human struggles may give us something to ponder in our own faith life. 

            With the Psalmist we can praise the Lord for saving those who call on him in their distress.  In his gracious mercy he is bountiful to those who need him. (Ps 116)


©  Betty Jane Lillie, S.C.

 

 

   
Directions| News| Events| Site Map| Vocations| Archdiocese Of Cincinnati| Other Dioceses| USCCB| Vatican